I hear what you are saying and i totally agree, the system is wrong and it needs revamped to bring back the proper balance.
How can SNH say they need more evidence?
Possibly because they are in bed with the RSPB?
I could never understand the need for pics of damaged fish, surely the majority of fish are marked and then eaten.
The best evidence is when a cormorant has been gutted and its last meal removed from its gullet.
You would think if you kept a good record of their visits to your fishery then that would be enough evidence but sadly not.
Do you know where the birds are roosting?
We are doing a cormorant census on the Clyde. We have been carrying out cormorant counts as the birds head back to roost.
We simultaneously count the birds at all the sites on the same night.
We have 3 main night roosts spread out on the Clyde system and last year we counted around 114 birds on the one night.
Each bird consumes one third of its body weight in fish each day.
Now the birds prey on all fish, grayling, trout, minnows, parr etc.
Even thou some of these fish are not sporting fish like the minnows and Parr there should still be a financial value added to these small fish after all the Parr will one day return to the river as a salmon which is the highest value fish in the system.
The reason we carried out the census was to put down a bench mark on how many birds were living inland on the Clyde and put an end to speculation.
When we do a count this year we will be able to measure it against last years count.
Only then can we tell if the numbers are increasing or decreasing.
For more info:
Cormorant Census
It is also worth while updating the cormorant watch website even thou the angling trust are based in England if they gather national statistics and make any head way lobbying government then in time it will help lobby the Scottish government.
Cormorant Watch