Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > Tackle and Book Talk > Tackle Talk
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-09-2009, 10:12 PM
adamroybooth's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Just North of Birmingham
Posts: 329
adamroybooth is on a distinguished road
Default Flouro and Mud

I have been using orvis mud on my tippets (rio flouro) and it struck me the other day that as it is slightly abrasive this must alter its "invisible" properties under the water ?

Anybody got any views ? am i off the mark ?

Many thanks

Ads
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14-09-2009, 10:36 PM
Ephemerella's Avatar
Member

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: City of Chester
Posts: 4,864
Ephemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to behold
Question

As I understand it; each microscopic scratch now reflects light from a myriad angles and thus will have completely destroyed your fluorocarbon's previous stealthy invisibility (by refractive index).
As fluoro is much denser than water, and sinks well, why abrade it in the first place?
__________________


Save the softmouth trout
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-09-2009, 10:38 PM
goldenolive's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 372
goldenolive is on a distinguished road
Default

Excellent point Ephemerella,

I too used fullers earth/fairy washing up liquid mix on my fluoro leaders,
I use riverge.
I'll have stop using the sinkant mix from now on!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-09-2009, 09:31 PM
adamroybooth's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Just North of Birmingham
Posts: 329
adamroybooth is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephemerella View Post
As I understand it; each microscopic scratch now reflects light from a myriad angles and thus will have completely destroyed your fluorocarbon's previous stealthy invisibility (by refractive index).
As fluoro is much denser than water, and sinks well, why abrade it in the first place?
Hi, thanks for the response.

My 3.6lb rio flouro does not sink. As it is quite a light bstrain it must not be heavy enough to get through the surface film.

Maybee xink is the answer ?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-09-2009, 11:39 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isleworth
Posts: 304
RogB is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephemerella View Post
As I understand it; each microscopic scratch now reflects light from a myriad angles and thus will have completely destroyed your fluorocarbon's previous stealthy invisibility (by refractive index).
As fluoro is much denser than water, and sinks well, why abrade it in the first place?
The refractive index isn't affected by scratches as it's an intrinsic property to the polymer - they wont scatter any more light in water as the indices still match. In air, as the refractive index of the polymer and air already differs significantly you will see the scratches just as you can see the tippet.

What may happen with scratches is that they trap small air bubbles which will reflect very strongly under water or general grease and grime from fingerprints which will also scatter light. Most likely is that the layer of mud is visible on the flourocarbon as mud is opaque and absorbs light. Best bet is to degrease it as best as possible such that it cuts through the surface using as thin a layer of mud as possible, or thin it with washing up liquid.

RogB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16-09-2009, 05:51 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 1,255
Ron Clay is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogB View Post
The refractive index isn't affected by scratches as it's an intrinsic property to the polymer - they wont scatter any more light in water as the indices still match. In air, as the refractive index of the polymer and air already differs significantly you will see the scratches just as you can see the tippet.

What may happen with scratches is that they trap small air bubbles which will reflect very strongly under water or general grease and grime from fingerprints which will also scatter light. Most likely is that the layer of mud is visible on the flourocarbon as mud is opaque and absorbs light. Best bet is to degrease it as best as possible such that it cuts through the surface using as thin a layer of mud as possible, or thin it with washing up liquid.

RogB
Quite right Rogb, the above is true.

As regards degreasing the tippet, some of the most effective still water dry
fly anglers do this to their fluorocarbon leaders. Even degreasing the leaders doesn't always cause them to sink, especially in a flat calm when the surface tension is at its strongest. One of the best expedients I have found is to apply a tiny, and I mean tiny amount of tungsten putty (Kryston Ultra Heavy Metal is the best) to the leader, about 18 inches from the fly. You have to get the amount right, too much and the fly sinks, too little and the leader wont sink.

Another way is to use a weighted fly on a dropper, fishing clothes line style. The only problem here is you can't adjust the weight like you can with the tungsten putty.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 16-09-2009, 06:50 PM
adamroybooth's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Just North of Birmingham
Posts: 329
adamroybooth is on a distinguished road
Default

Great replies, thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 18-09-2009, 11:34 AM
Ephemerella's Avatar
Member

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: City of Chester
Posts: 4,864
Ephemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to beholdEphemerella is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogB View Post
The refractive index isn't affected by scratches as it's an intrinsic property to the polymer - they wont scatter any more light in water as the indices still match. In air, as the refractive index of the polymer and air already differs significantly you will see the scratches just as you can see the tippet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Clay View Post
Quite right Rogb, the above is true..


I find it not to be.



Despite close refractive indexes fluorocarbon is still visible in water. Try it, drop a short cut off hook length, leave the fly on, into a tumbler of water. Hold it to the light and marvel how it seems to almost glow at the knot and on any damaged or kinked sections.
At least this is the case on the 12 to 15 lb tippet lengths I've tested in Momoi Seaguar and other, such as Loop and Scientific Angler, quality 100% fluorocarbon brands.
I've no experience on really light fluoro, prefering 4 lb co-polymer for small dries, however I'm sure the same will apply - but maybe requiring a magnifying glass?
__________________


Save the softmouth trout
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 18-09-2009, 11:37 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: EAST COAST OF IRELAND
Posts: 4,953
hobble is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree 100%
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd