Quote:
Originally Posted by WelshOsprey
I'm looking to buy a reel for my 7'6"#3 rod and like the Okuma SLV as I already have one in a larger size for me 8'8"#4/5 rod. The SLV is available in these sizes
#2/3 Weight 133gr, 66mm dia., WF3 plus 20yds of 12lb.
#4/5 Weight 145gr, 75mm dia., WF4 plus 95yds of 12lb.
I have hear many on here say that for small brook rods lightness of reel is everything. Is there a point where a reel can become too small ie in diameter. I intend to fit the reel with half a DT3 and Rio 20lb backing so presume I'll get more than 20 yards on it. Do I need more than 20 yards backing for brook fishing anyway?
In essence is the 2/3 reel okay or should I look at the 4/5 for any reason?
|
SLV's a great choice, excellent reel and value for money.
Personally, I would go with the 4/5. The 2/3's diameter of 66 MM is extremely small, IMO, and it would be very fussy to use. Also, with a DT, it may well just barely hold a full #3 line if it does at all.
I wouldn't say having a light weight reel is
everything. In brook fishing the attribute I find most handy in a reel is the ability to pick up the line quickly. When moving from place to place through the brush, I need to completely reel up, not like fishing a big river where you can let some line drag in the the water and wade ahead. So for that reason, I'd go slightly larger.
Also, c'mon, the weight difference between the two is like the weight of pencil. It's not like you'll have to carry an extra pound.
Backing? Forget it. put a little on so it's easier to connect the line. It's Fantasy Island to think you'll ever need it fighting a fish on a small stream. If you get even half a line out there'd be about zero chance of landing the fish because he'd cluster-eff you by getting into a brush pile, or overhanging tree, etc and break you.
Grouse