Quote:
Originally Posted by bloke
The fact of the matter is the Wye fish are from the Rhine.....that is why they they are so big.
who gives a flying **** where the fish originated.............lets have more fish
The only people who argue "genetic integrity" are idiots employed by the government.
... snipped ... (so as not to detract from the other excellent point Mick made.)
|
Yes, there is a case showing the Wye was remarkably transformed by the stocking of Rhine juvenile salmon by Frank Buckland - H.M. Inspector of Fisheries in the 1860s. The Wye
portmanteaux were long and heavy just like those of the Thames fish used to be.
When the ice sheets of the last Ice Age finally lifted, about 12,000 years ago, to reveal the Thames, we were still connected to continental Europe, a major tributary of the Rhine, the estuary only becoming the English Channel when sea levels eventually rose. Therefore I've no doubt they were of genetically the same stock. Sadly the Rhine salmon followed those of the Thames into total extinction, but only half a century ago.
The longest salmon catalogued at the South Kensington Museum was a Rhine example of 4' 8" weighing 69 lbs. The same museum mentions a 70 pounder taken near Fulham in 1789.
Sobering to think that the only remnants of this 4+ SW strain run into the upper reaches of the Wye and Elan tributary. Numbers reduced by 98% in the last 30 years. I think the "idiots employed by the goverment" ought to look at saving them - surely there is a duty of care - before its too late?