I don't think casting length matters too much as long as it's reaching fish but I think the angle between the rod tip and the fish might matter, also the stiffness of the rod.
I hooked in to a good salmon last week working down a pool using short casts from a 10ft rod that's pretty bendy. The fish was off quite quickly. I noticed that all the fish but one that I and others fishing nearby caught last week were hooked in the top of the mouth either at the front or to one side, so the fish weren't turning much on the fly. When this happens it helps to have some good leverage. I was wondering if a lack of angle of leverage might have shortened the odds on landing a fish.
The two fish I did get - both good fish - took small flies on maybe a 20 yard cast but they were held well with a strong 15ft rod - the Sage Z-axis. The reason I used a single-hander some of the time is that I think it covers a channel effectively and fast. You can put three or four casts out, moving down the line in the time it takes a 30 yard cast to swing around over the hot spot. Also, the fish doesn't have as much time to see the fly and I think that can help. For hooking and quick playing of a big fish, a bigger, stiffer rod is better I think but it doesn't give you much sport on grilse. The trouble was that big and little were mixed together last week.
I noticed that the grilse were sometimes playing with the fly - plucking or shaking it, rather than hooking themselves. Length of line doesn't matter so much in such situations. I would rather have a well hooked fish on a long line than a poorly hooked one on a short cast.
regards,
Richard
Last edited by Deesider; 27-08-2007 at 04:51 PM.
|