Now I don't usually read Total Flyfisher or Trout Fisherman but having been away on holiday for a week I bought both in order to while away some time (turned out to be minutes). As a consequence I've watched the DVD and to be perfectly frank (sorry Frank!) I fail to see what has promoted this outpouring of angst and 'moral' outrage. If rainbow trout are half as 'fragile' as some posters are suggesting then I'm afraid we shouldn't be fishing for them at all.
Yes, we should treat our quarry with respect and I saw no evidence in the DVD that either angler was disrespectful. I've witnessed trout being kicked up banks, thrown flapping into the bottom of boats, having hooks ripped out of them - that's the sort of behaviour that should be condemned. I did however, notice that fish were being supported in the water until recovered.
Barbed hooks!

Trout flapping in a knotless net!

No video evidence of wet hands!
This, and the previous thread on this subject, does however raise a more interesting dilemma .... do the majority of current posters know a lot about very little ... or very little about a lot?