Quote:
Originally Posted by d_j_vass
..... enquiring about the suitability of multi section rods, of course the reply sings the praises of the multi sections. A bit strange I thought, until I turned the page and guess what's reviewed in the tackle section? Yup a 4 piece Hardy Uniqua, and guess what was awarded the prodigious 'Tackle Testers Choice' ? So that's the deal take out a full page advert and get 'Tackle Testers Choice' on any sh@te.
I'll get my swingers out again and predict that 4 sectioned rods will be a disaster for Hardy.
|
Whilst in no way wishing to or feeling the need to defend either TF or Hardys, does '4 piece' really count as 'multi-piece' these days?
If someone says multi-piece to me I tend to think of rods like the Orvis Frequent Flyer or the March Brown Series of 6 and 7 pieces.
Why will four section rods be a disaster for Hardy? The Sage rods I own are 4 piece as are some of my Winstons, a couple are 5 piece. No disasters there that I can report. For many, these days, 4 piece is the 'norm' and has been for some considerable time and from a personal perspective I see nothing but benefits from the four piece approach.
With regard to the magazine 'reviews', no advertising revenue ... no magazine. Mind you, with TF and TFF in particular, would that be any great loss?