Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Discussion
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2010, 10:35 PM
diawl bach's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,590
diawl bach will become famous soon enough
Default Fishing line labelling attracts attention of Trading Stanrs

Here's a snippet from what I believe to be a long overdue investigation into the misleading claims made by line manufacturers. What the outcome will be remains to be seen of course but it may be to the advantage of the average angler -

"TRADING Standards in the UK have started investigating the labelling of fishing lines – with offenders facing potential prosecution. The organisation, which incorporates weights and measures into its remit, has already contacted a number of line brand owners after carrying out its own investigation into the market. It is also calling on the UK trade to help it establish a ‘Kite Mark’ for the industry."

Link to full article
__________________
Musha rig um du rum da
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2010, 10:39 PM
PitsfordPirate's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northants and Fife
Posts: 5,369
PitsfordPirate will become famous soon enough
Default

In our world that would be leader material.

The Pirate.
__________________
Sonik Sports Team Pitsford Pirates - No pressure, just pleasure! Pip pip!

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/trade-cla...e-bonanza.html

http://www.soniksports.com/

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/fly-lines...unkistbob.html
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2010, 10:53 PM
scooby180169's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: livingston
Posts: 797
scooby180169 is on a distinguished road
Default

At least it,s a start lines will probably come aswell if they are as misleading as
the nylon. interesting diawl back
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2010, 11:04 PM
PitsfordPirate's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northants and Fife
Posts: 5,369
PitsfordPirate will become famous soon enough
Default

Fly lines are graded on grain weights.

Scroll down to the table on the following link.

Choosing the Right Fly Line

This is based on the first 30ft of the line.

There are 15.4323584 grains in 1 gramme; therefore the first 30ft of a WF#7 for example should weigh 11.99 grammes, with a tolerance between 11.47 and 12.51 grammes.

Hardly rocket science.

The Pirate.
__________________
Sonik Sports Team Pitsford Pirates - No pressure, just pleasure! Pip pip!

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/trade-cla...e-bonanza.html

http://www.soniksports.com/

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/fly-lines...unkistbob.html

Last edited by PitsfordPirate; 19-01-2010 at 11:38 PM. Reason: Spolling mistook
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 12:40 AM
scooby180169's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: livingston
Posts: 797
scooby180169 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PitsfordPirate View Post
Fly lines are graded on grain weights.

Scroll down to the table on the following link.

Choosing the Right Fly Line

This is based on the first 30ft of the line.

There are 15.4323584 grains in 1 gramme; therefore the first 30ft of a WF#7 for example should weigh 11.99 grammes, with a tolerance between 11.47 and 12.51 grammes.

Hardly rocket science.

The Pirate.
As i said if they are the same. I was led to believe there tolerance were +- 8 grains. Did someone mention rocket science
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 12:48 AM
3lbgrayling's Avatar
Member

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 17,129
3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Regarding leader strength/diameter, long overdue, a can of worms.

Jim
__________________
The Fishermans Friend is the Flirty Fly,Fickle Food for Fleeting Fish.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 07:41 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Deepest Darkest Wales
Posts: 2,168
DownStream is on a distinguished road
Default

I've not measured anything which was very misleading on stated diameter - but "Breaking Strain" could easily be pure B.S.
__________________
Plusnet/Madasafish > Liars to the internet community
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 07:52 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 1,255
Ron Clay is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownStream View Post
I've not measured anything which was very misleading on stated diameter - but "Breaking Strain" could easily be pure B.S.

"Breaking strain", is indeed BS as you can get a whole range of spurious values depending on how the line is broken.

And the temperature, and whether the line is wet or not!

The Americans rate fishing lines on pounds "test" which I believe is the force a line will take before breaking, although I am not entirely sure about this.

The best way to rate monofilament lines is by diameter. And we must get rid of the archaic "X" system.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 08:39 AM
Tommy Ruffe's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ecclesfield Parish.
Posts: 1,171
Tommy Ruffe is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Tommy Ruffe Send a message via Yahoo to Tommy Ruffe
Default

Not sure that just rating lines by diameter is the way to go. Many of the line diameters I've checked with a micrometer have been pretty accurate.

I think there should be a standardised knot-strength test as it would be far more relevant to anglers.
__________________
*
How poor a thing, sometimes I find,
Will captivate a greedy mind
- Isaac Walton.

~~*~~~~~
*****©(

Last edited by Tommy Ruffe; 20-01-2010 at 08:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2010, 08:52 AM
sculpin_crusader's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cambs
Posts: 290
sculpin_crusader is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Clay View Post
The best way to rate monofilament lines is by diameter. And we must get rid of the archaic "X" system.
I agree, I have always bought and used lines based on diameter, ranging from .18 to .10. I use Fox Micro plus+ line, it has a very high breaking strain to diameter ratio. Ive always found the "X" system confusing.
__________________
"Water is peculiar stuff. It circulates mysteriously, rising invisibly from the sea as vapour, forming clouds, falling as rain, creating streams and rivers that return again to the sea. You can swallow it in sips, but it can swallow you whole if you fall into a deep place. You can't catch hold of it, but it can catch hold of you, even if you just look at it."
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd