Fly fishing, like any pursuit, has more than few urban legends. These urban legends are repeated over and over again by well-meaning anglers, but ultimately they are either untrue, only partially true, or they were true at one time but modern technology has rendered them obsolete.
So that got me thinking, why not a Fly Fishing MythBuster thread? I'll get it started with the easy ones:
The Dual Line Weight Myth
Myth: Rods that carry a dual line rating (like 6/7) do so because the lower weight refers to a DT line and the higher weight refers to a WF line. So with a rod rated as a 6/7, you should use a #6 DT and a #7 WF.
Rod makers do this because a DT line is heavier than a WF because the DT line does not taper to a thinner line.
Fly Fishing MythBusters Verdict - Total myth. Completely untrue.
This fly fishing urban legend has driven me crazy for years. Like many urban legends, the armchair logic used to explain it sounds convincing, but it's totally wrong.
Even worse, the dual line rating myth has been circulated and repeated by many experienced anglers and angling journalists who should know better.
Pittsford Pirate has very correctly debunked this myth a number of times with the following:
"Click on the link and scroll to the bottom....
http://www.flyfishusa.com/lines/choose-line-home.html
As it confirms, fly lines are rated on grain weights, based upon the first 30ft of line, regardless of whether it is a DT or WF.
Incidentally, there are 15.432 grains in 1 grammes. The first 30ft of say both a DT#5 and WF#5 should be approximately 140 grains (9.07 grammes), with a margin of error of 134 to 146 grains (8.68 to 9.46 grammes)."
The bottom line is that a dual line rating means simply "either/or". The first 30 feet of a WF and DT weigh the same, so the dual rating has nothing to do with the taper of a line, it's just the manufacturer hedging their bets.
There. Now that we've debunked the dual line rating myth once and for all

what myth should we take on next?
Grouse