When does a Lure cease to become a Lure?
And when does what might be judged an imitative fly become a lure?
Many years ago, the late Fred Wagstaffe spent a great deal of his time in pursuit of the big grown-on brown trout of Grafham and Rutland Water. He devised a "fly" called a Waggy which had a flexible rubber wiggle tail at the back, was tied tandem style and looked for all the world like a small fish in the water. Fred came under a lot of stick for "cheating"; but was he really?
He was actually "matching the hatch" in the best way possible. Big still water brown trout, whether they live in lake, loch or reservoir, feed mainly on small fish, and some bigger ones too. I once found a small yellowfish of at least a pound in the jaws of a 7 pound brownie years ago.
An talking of flies, there is no doubt in my mind that some of them represent nothing on earth, fully dressed traditional salmon flies for example or the range of trout traditionals such as Wickhams Fancy, Partridge and Orange, Alexandra, Mallard and Claret etc etc. Perhaps an angler using a sparkler lure, or a zonker, or a minkie is being far more sporting in the immitative sense?
And maybe, just maybe, a few of those wonderfully tied nymphs we see are taken by trout not because of what they represent, but because they have invaded a trout's territory and have caused a violent response from the trout.
Heaven forbid!
Last edited by Ron Clay; 21-09-2009 at 08:28 AM.
|