Quote:
Originally Posted by IanG
Don't forget that ofwat govern the amount of capital spend water companies are forced to carry out re sewer network infrastructure, treatment works improvements, storm sewage storage etc etc etc. The EA can and do ask for what they want............... ofwat then listen to the water company and how much joe public, bill payer will have to stump up to pay for it and, guess what........
EA's hands are tied. Also the instant replacement of , say one medium sized towns sewer network to, for example, double its capacity is physically impossible, even if there were several hundred million quid going spare to do it.
|
There is no need to double the capacity of the sewers. The practice of combining sewage with ground water and rain is what is at fault. There should be no such thing as combined sewers. Rain water should go into soak aways. Sewage,
only sewage, should go into sewers.
EA appears to be on the side of the polluter when it comes to the water companies. The woman from the EA on Panorama should be ashamed of herself.
richard
---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:17 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19 Fut Sheelin
A classic example of why water companies should not be in private hands. Private companies are in business to make money for their shareholders, everything else is secondary. The entire thing is a farce, gas companies selling electricity and vice versa with no regard for the customer and less for the rules. And water companies crying that they have to release sewerage into our rivers and beaches BECAUSE IT RAINED!!!! For heavens sake they are supposed to be WATER companies, surely the clue should be in the name.
(Sorry for shouting but these money grabbers really tick me off.)
Simon.
|
Unfortunately for your theory, history shows that when the whole thing was in the public sector the situation was far worse. It was nationalised water authorities that granted themselves all the dreadful consents that the water companies and the EA use to claim legality and imply that nothing can be done about the problem.
If you want to make a really effective change, better to get rid of OFWAT, rescind all consents to discharge and use Common Law to prosecute the polluters.
richard