Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Discussion
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-08-2009, 12:52 PM
jock's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 51
jock is on a distinguished road
Default WF or DT

My floating line is beginning to show signs of wear and its time to lever open my wallet.I dont want to spend a fortune but am prepared to pay for a good quality line I've read a good bit about the merits of different makes and the airflo ridge sounds good any advice would be great I am also not too sure whether WF or DT would be best I have read that the weight of the first 30 foot is the same for both lines (aftm 7 ) so what are the benifits of either line. I would rather hear from the guys who actually use the lines as as opposed to the makers who I'm sure are honest enough but are hardly going to tell us the downsides of thier products.
__________________
Lang may yer lum reek
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-08-2009, 01:00 PM
scotty9's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 2,037
scotty9 is on a distinguished road
Default

At heavier weights like a #7, the WF taper is FAR more popular. It will shoot better, enabling a longer cast with ease. A DT line will need more to be aerialised... To be honest there's not much point listing the supposed benefits of either, as you will get a WF line! I can almost guarantee it

I woudn't go for the airflo floater, get shocking reviews in the past and i personally wouldn't risk them. Have a look at snowbee, rio, scientific anglers, cortland or the pirate on here. Won't go far wrong with these manufacturers.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-08-2009, 01:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: northamptonshire
Posts: 89
taylor990 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jock View Post
the airflo ridge sounds good
if your thinking of these lines then i would suggest you join the fishtec membership for £35 and you can select 2 lines in the range:
http://www.fishtec.co.uk/ProductsInC...Ref=40&cat=751

regards,
matt.....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-08-2009, 10:28 PM
Amber's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 196
Amber is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi,
For river fishing I would go for a DT so you can aerialise more line and don't have to retrieve so much then false cast.
Depending on the size of the river/your cast if your fishing down a pool you can lift and re-cast without false casting with a DT.

However for still water a WF.
For WF I like Snowbee and have recently been using Partridge.

If you shop around there are some good deals going on Partridge.

http://www.johnnorris.co.uk/shop/br_...dgeofredditch/
http://www.grahamsonline.co.uk/results.php

Regards
Amber
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19-08-2009, 10:32 PM
snaggit's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 1,509
snaggit is on a distinguished road
Default

wether you choose dt or wf i would get yer lines from these guys, pitsford pirate "on here"or impactflies.com both are great prices and great lines not cheapo jobs
__________________
If in doubt, get the montys out

Intelligence is relative to your environment
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 19-08-2009, 11:03 PM
Country Joe's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: dumfries
Posts: 2,250
Country Joe is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty9 View Post
At heavier weights like a #7, the WF taper is FAR more popular. It will shoot better, enabling a longer cast with ease. A DT line will need more to be aerialised... To be honest there's not much point listing the supposed benefits of either, as you will get a WF line! I can almost guarantee it

I woudn't go for the airflo floater, get shocking reviews in the past and i personally wouldn't risk them. Have a look at snowbee, rio, scientific anglers, cortland or the pirate on here. Won't go far wrong with these manufacturers.
Ive recently purchased a WF and a DT for my 9ft 6 rod,
and on a stillwater i get as good presentation with the WF,
So for stillwater i would go for the WF.
I have criticised Airflo floaters in the past but i did buy the ultra supple floater
Coral coloured and its not a bad line, it lies straight and casts well.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-08-2009, 06:58 AM
Tommy Ruffe's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ecclesfield Parish.
Posts: 1,171
Tommy Ruffe is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Tommy Ruffe Send a message via Yahoo to Tommy Ruffe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Country Joe And The Fish View Post
Ive recently purchased a WF and a DT for my 9ft 6 rod,
and on a stillwater i get as good presentation with the WF,
So for stillwater i would go for the WF.
I have criticised Airflo floaters in the past but i did buy the ultra supple floater
Coral coloured and its not a bad line, it lies straight and casts well
.
One of our members uses one of these lines and it looks the real deal.
__________________
*
How poor a thing, sometimes I find,
Will captivate a greedy mind
- Isaac Walton.

~~*~~~~~
*****©(
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 20-08-2009, 07:29 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Near Southampton
Posts: 1,873
JohnH is on a distinguished road
Default

Try a different approach - go for mid price lines and buy one of each like Country Joe & the fish did. Or even two WFs and one DT. That way, on a reservoir for example you could carry a DT6 line ready rigged with a light leader for dry flies or small nymphs at close range and a WF7 ready for deep nymph fishing.

My experience is that the law of diminishing returns often applies to fishing tackle and particularly to fly lines. So a Cortland or Rio line might be a bit better than a Pitsford Pirate, Sparton or Barrio one, but it won't be three hundred per cent better and nor will it last three times longer, even though it costs three times more. Spend your money on flexibility, not a so called top brand name.
__________________
"In wine there is wisdom. In beer there is strength. In water there is bacteria." - German proverb
JH based near Southampton
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 20-08-2009, 07:32 AM
Carlos's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, Sydenham Hill
Posts: 1,635
Carlos is on a distinguished road
Default

Jock, I'd do a search on the subject in Tackle and General threads. It is debated every couple of months or so.

The general consensus is WF from both general users (like myself) and also from the suppliers such as Pitsford Pirate. Generally I only use WF and have found no advantage in a DT.

I do use a Sage quite taper #2 DT. But this was given to me, it is an excellent line but it is not the DT that counts more the taper itself and the line quality.
__________________
Carl

http://www.wandlepiscators.net/
http://teiseangling.co.uk/index.htm

TOMORROW THE TRENT COULD BE YOUR FISHERY! When are YOU going to JOIN THE ANGLING TRUST?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 20-08-2009, 09:37 PM
Country Joe's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: dumfries
Posts: 2,250
Country Joe is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnH View Post
Try a different approach - go for mid price lines and buy one of each like Country Joe & the fish did. Or even two WFs and one DT. That way, on a reservoir for example you could carry a DT6 line ready rigged with a light leader for dry flies or small nymphs at close range and a WF7 ready for deep nymph fishing.

My experience is that the law of diminishing returns often applies to fishing tackle and particularly to fly lines. So a Cortland or Rio line might be a bit better than a Pitsford Pirate, Sparton or Barrio one, but it won't be three hundred per cent better and nor will it last three times longer, even though it costs three times more. Spend your money on flexibility, not a so called top brand name.
i agree i purchased the two lines in WF and DT and i got a good deal,
as the post says you can carry the two lines and use the one you like best in different situations. but on stillwaters that i now fish, i seem to be using the WF more.
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd