Quote:
Originally Posted by chickenfish
Hi all,
I try to release all the trout that i catch but i've always been a firm believer that if a fish is bleeding then it probably will not survive and it should be dispatched.
Is this right?
|
No, it's totally wrong.
If you cut your finger do you die from it? Of course not. Then why would you think a trout would always die just because it's bleeding?
Also, the fact that the fish is wet will dilute the blood and make it appear as though a fish is bleeding far more than it actually is.
In the most comprehensive studies of mortality due to catch and release of rod-caught fish, the survival rate is between 97 and 99+%. The studies treat all fish the same, so presumably a good portion of the fish in the study were released with various levels of bleeding and still 97+% survive.
Also, anecdotal as it may be, think about this. The best trout rivers where I fish here in the US are 100% C&R and have been that way for almost 10 years in many cases. The C&R is mandatory, there is no "I conked it because it was bleeding" option. You must put all fish back in the water or you'll be wearing handcuffs.
So given the fishing pressure on these waters, and the numbers of fish being caught every day (hundreds) if all those bleeding trout died, by now there would almost certainly be no fish left, right? In fact, these rivers have the highest populations of trout and they have maintained or increased these populations every year. So much for the theory that all those fish die.
Release the fish and there's a very high chance it will survive. Conk it, and there's a 100% chance it will be dead.
Grouse