Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Forums > General Fly Fishing Discussion
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 08:47 AM
gadusmorhua's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Chilterns
Posts: 935
gadusmorhua is on a distinguished road
Default Water knot droppers

I've been re-reading Arthur Cove's 'My Way with Trout', and was surprised to notice he advocated using the dropper pointing towards the fly line, when using the water knot.I've always found this dropper to be significantly weaker than the downward facing one, especially with fluorocarbon.When the book was published, 1986, there would only have been nylon, and he favoured the cheaper brands.I have vague memories of using the back-facing dropper then, but also have definite memories of thinking droppers a weak point, and playing fish carefully when on the dropper.The back-facing dropper fishes better, and tangles less, but snaps off easily in my experience.Arthur used four turns, I only use three, even with nylon/copoly etc.
What do you favour?
__________________
Behold the fisherman
He riseth up early and disturbeth the whole household.
MIGHTY ARE HIS PREPARATIONS!
He goeth forth full of hope and when the day is far spent he returneth
Smelling of strong drink, and the truth is not in him
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 09:08 AM
andrew w's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cheddar
Posts: 323
andrew w is on a distinguished road
Default

3 turns for me - and definitely with the dropper facing towards the point.
The only advantage of the other way is that it's usually the lighter nylon that ends up facing the flyline.
But modern fluorocarbon tends to be more brittle.
__________________
Andrew W

"Maybe all one can do is hope to end up with the right regrets." Arthur Miller
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 09:14 AM
3lbgrayling's Avatar
Member

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 17,126
3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light
Default

The upward facing dropper was the style in the 60/70's but it was proven to be weaker and went the way of the DoDo

Jim
__________________
The Fishermans Friend is the Flirty Fly,Fickle Food for Fleeting Fish.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 09:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 401
Alwyn is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gadusmorhua View Post
I've been re-reading Arthur Cove's 'My Way with Trout', and was surprised to notice he advocated using the dropper pointing towards the fly line, when using the water knot.I've always found this dropper to be significantly weaker than the downward facing one, especially with fluorocarbon.When the book was published, 1986, there would only have been nylon, and he favoured the cheaper brands.I have vague memories of using the back-facing dropper then, but also have definite memories of thinking droppers a weak point, and playing fish carefully when on the dropper.The back-facing dropper fishes better, and tangles less, but snaps off easily in my experience.Arthur used four turns, I only use three, even with nylon/copoly etc.
What do you favour?
I've never read his book, but if he advocates using the upward tag of a water knot, I'd encourage you to ignore that advice. A fish would be pulling against the knot rather than through it, as is the case with the downward leg. I use four turns, although some use 3. Oliver Edwards seems to use 2! If you're having trouble with the downward leg of a dropper not standing out and wrapping around your leader, try doing a simple overhand knot with the dropper over the main leader - it will then sit at a right angle to the leader. This works for me.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 10:52 AM
gadusmorhua's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Chilterns
Posts: 935
gadusmorhua is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3lbgrayling View Post
The upward facing dropper was the style in the 60/70's but it was proven to be weaker and went the way of the DoDo

Jim
Just struck me as odd Jim that someone of Arthur's skill would choose the weak one.
__________________
Behold the fisherman
He riseth up early and disturbeth the whole household.
MIGHTY ARE HIS PREPARATIONS!
He goeth forth full of hope and when the day is far spent he returneth
Smelling of strong drink, and the truth is not in him
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 11:14 AM
3lbgrayling's Avatar
Member

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 17,126
3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light3lbgrayling is a glorious beacon of light
Default

As stated,They were using mono that was way overstrength so they got away with it.But you won't with modern fluro/co-poly or pre stretched double strength.


jim
__________________
The Fishermans Friend is the Flirty Fly,Fickle Food for Fleeting Fish.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 11:19 AM
PitsfordPirate's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northants and Fife
Posts: 5,369
PitsfordPirate will become famous soon enough
Default

Two-turn water knot for me, dropper lengths again pointing away from fly line.

I've said it a thousand times, three or more turns is simply pointless and weakens the knot.

You gotta love Cove's 'My way with trout', an absolute chuckle a minute.

Try bringing out a book today with a cover shot of the author with a fag hanging out their mouth.

The Pirate.
__________________
Sonik Sports Team Pitsford Pirates - No pressure, just pleasure! Pip pip!

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/trade-cla...e-bonanza.html

http://www.soniksports.com/

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/fly-lines...unkistbob.html
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 11:28 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 580
j-the-trout is on a distinguished road
Default

Simple answer - use tippet rings, then you can have different breaking strain droppers irrespective of you leader strength (apart from all of the other advantages)

Jeff
__________________
Location - Just outside of Nottingham - Robin Hood country!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 12:00 PM
SharkeyP's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ribble Valley
Posts: 1,742
SharkeyP is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm a semi-convert to tippet rings. They make for flexible and strong leaders but they don't make untangling any easier!

My first choice floater lost its braided loop last time out (my clumsy application of Mucilin) so I've nail knotted 8ft+ of tapered leader, down to about 6lb and put a tippet ring on the end. I can blood knot any sort of tippet to this, and make an easy dropper, potentially from the tag end or tied as a seperate length.Click the image to open in full size.

This was a better fix than my temporary grinner that I used for the last half hours fishing but with that I noticed better turnover and less sinking of the fly line end (the original reason for the addition of Mucilin). There has to be less wind resistance, and less 'elbow' than even a well fixed braided loop. I've had a good swing on it and it seems secure. Would a dab of superglue help or hinder do you think?

Someone on here pointed out that a dropper on a tippet ring acts as a tell tale if you miss a bite, as the knot will be pulled down parallel to the main line. I guess that depends on how tight your blood knot is but I'll watch out for that. Nice to know which fly is fishing the right depth and attracting the trout.

Problem with tippet rings is they are tiny, and even in good light and with the aid of a retaining paperclip (less likely than a safety-pin to flirt them everywhere or stab myself with the pointy end!) they are fiddly. I prefer to tie them on at home. They are manageable once they are tied onto at least one length of tippet.

I've been tying three turn water knots and found them fallible with hard fluorocarbon. I'll have an experiment with Pirate's suggestion of two turns only.

SharkeyP

Last edited by SharkeyP; 13-02-2009 at 02:27 PM. Reason: missing 'ring'
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2009, 12:40 PM
gadusmorhua's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Chilterns
Posts: 935
gadusmorhua is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PitsfordPirate View Post
Try bringing out a book today with a cover shot of the author with a fag hanging out their mouth.
They didn't have a lot of choice, I think he was born with a fag in his mouth- I never saw him without one on the go.We bought our maggots from him when I worked in a tackle shop as a lad and he would have three fags with his cuppa.
I got him to sign my book 'to Rick, thanks for all the help and advice' ! (as has Steve Parton, obligingly)

I'll go back to the two turns, my boat partner knots that way, but I drifted back to three out of habit, can't say I've had any problems though.
I can't get on with those little rings, I can hardly see them, let alone feel them, and I can tie a leader up in a minute.
__________________
Behold the fisherman
He riseth up early and disturbeth the whole household.
MIGHTY ARE HIS PREPARATIONS!
He goeth forth full of hope and when the day is far spent he returneth
Smelling of strong drink, and the truth is not in him
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd