Quote:
Originally Posted by RPS
I'd bet he wouldn't decend to using a Testwood "Nymph", that is unless he was clearing weed.
|
Bit of a pompous statement that. An original Testwood nymph is actually not much bigger or heavier than one of his own. I think Sawyer was clever enough to use whichever style of nymph suited where he was fishing and what he was trying to catch. He fished many times at Nursling - the Nursling nymph is a lot heavier because of the faster, deeper water - and there is a superb chapter in his book Nymphs and the Trout(?) where he describes catching salmon on the Avon at Somerley and at Broadlands on the Test using nymphs.
What is thought of as being a new way of catching salmon was actually being tried by Sawyer over fifty years ago. So much for progress! I have said before that Sawyer no doubt recognised the difference between salmon fishing on the chalkstreams and trout fishing. You try to deceive trout to catch them but have to **** salmon off to catch them.
He certainly wouldn't think that in using the appropriate weight and size of nymph would in any way be "descending."
Reg Wyatt