Re: your thoughts
If I read the article correctly, he was not jailed for poaching 43 years ago but for breaking an order that still stands.
He also had the opportunity to avoid jail by saying he would obey the judgement. I don't think the man is totally faultless.
The offer of clemency was to forgive this incident if he would obey. But he refused. It seems to me that there was no alternative other than to have a judge remove the order, which he said he could not afford.
Any normal person of his age would have approached the son and asked permission to go along the river with his grandchildren. But NOOOOOO, he couldn't do that. He chooses to picket the son and provoke a test of wills. That man is an ASS, an elderly ASS but an ASS non the less.
I don't think anyone can flaunt the law, but that is just me. In the colonies, we have a saying that states. "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime."
__________________
Silver Creek- "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"....Szent-Gyorgy
Last edited by silver creek; 23-09-2011 at 05:04 PM.
|