Quote:
Originally Posted by The Famous Grouse
Really a nice story and pictures. That's a fine looking trout that Wilson caught there.
Just curious, have you conducted any netting or electrofishing surveys and if so what are you seeing as far as natural reproduction?
Grouse
|
E.A. Fisheries and Vaughan Lewis (AEC Windrush consultancy) have done a number of surveys. At the moment there are only stickleback and bullhead upstream of the large weir where the fish pass is going to be fitted. Downstream of this weir there is a mixed bunch of stuff - including trout derived from the schools' projects. These trout do cut redds and, as of last year, there was a single "stream spawned" fry found by Theo during his "Riverfly" kick sampling (this was the week before the schools released their fry - so it could only have come from in-stream spawning).
The electrofishing surveys reveal mainly "adult" trout with a few smaller fish (they grow very fast) but currently the in-stream reproductive success is very low. Part of this will be due to a relative lack of good quality spawning habitat (or inability to access such habitat). There will also be a strong contributory factor from the fish being relatively domesticated due to their hatchery origin. Typically, domesticated fish have only one tenth of the reproduction and survival rate in the wild compared to wild fish.
Our plan is to use wild parr (which will be very much more genetically diverse and also chosen from a river with very similar characteristics to the Wandle). The pre-adaptation of such fish to surviving and reproducing in a similar wild environment (as well as the greater "adaptability" conferred by having greater genetic diversity) is the main reason for this approach.
Using parr, rather than adult fish, means that the donor river will not be depleted of their brood stock and one of the main criteria for choosing such a donor river will be that it produces a surplus of juvenile fish (i.e. they undergo "density dependent" mortality). It will also avoid the problems of artificial selection that are part and parcel of "wild broodstock" schemes. Recent work shows that even first generation fish produced from eggs and milt of pure wild fish differ significantly from any of the native breeding populations from which they are derived.
Our intention (subject to obtaining all the correct permissions) will be to use a mixture of 0+ and 1+ parr (fished from short sections of the donor river - turning off the electrodes for at least equivalent reach lengths between each "fished" section) and to repeat the "seeding" of parr over two years. In the interim we must ensure that there is plentiful cover for each different stage of juvenile fish (from swim up fry to 1+ parr) so that any instream spawning success is maximised by good juvenile survival. We already know from the school "Trout in the Classroom" fish that the adults grow and survive very well.
Fingers crossed.
Edit: The reason that the natural population has not been restarted by Thames seatrout migration is simply the number of impassable weirs on the system (for a chalkstream, the gradient is quite steep which made it a favourite for water-powered industry - hence hundreds of weirs!)
---------- Post added at 07:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:08 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by woz
A cracker of a brownie Paul and a damn good read too... 
|
Nice one Woz - how about that fish from Manchester!
PG