I am very guilty of following the latest 'fad' in the likes of fly rods, and have spent many hundreds of pounds in 'must have's'.......probably a fishing tackle advertising guy's dream. I own rods from Sage, Loomis, Hardy......and Shakespeare.....know something folks....my old Shakey Oracle 15ft 3 piece is pretty close to being as good as any of them. It is hard to openly admit this after all the money i have spent.
What is it with fishermen [or maybe just me, which i doubt]...do we sometimes equate the more expensive the better, which in turn means more fish, or is it possible we might even stroke our own ego's by being seen on the river with the latest kit, or think that owning this latest kit will make us better anglers?
Is there really so much difference between a good £50/60/70 rod and a good £700 rod.......i am going to stick my neck out and say no. Nicer finished [there is even some doubt about that....the cork on my Loomis Stinger is not one bit better than my 'Oracle'....and it is *****.
I honestly think we tend to be 'suckers' regarding the well oiled advertising machine.
tin hat and flack jacket at the ready...



Lochan