Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > Fly Tying > Fly Tying Forum
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2010, 08:37 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Somewhere?
Posts: 431
flyinghigh is on a distinguished road
Default Testing Camera

Just testing new camera to see what its like.
Set it to Super macro is this right?

All comments welcome.
Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by flyinghigh; 11-01-2010 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2010, 09:29 PM
benlikestofish's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 600
benlikestofish is on a distinguished road
Default

Super Macro is right, but your images are not in focus, are you using a tripod?

A pile of books with a beanbag or bluetack or something to keep your camera still is very important for macro photography.

Lighting seems ok. There is quite a lot of noise in the image, what camera are you using?

Hope this is helpful and not to critical.
__________________
SpottyHors Fly Fishers
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2010, 09:58 PM
Scratch's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chorley
Posts: 8,341
Scratch has a spectacular aura aboutScratch has a spectacular aura about
Default

Yes, agree with Ben... Noisy, grainy, soft etc. Not very appealing to be honest mate. Something tells me it's more than just technique. The lighting looks on the low side to me, so if those shots are hand-held, then that'll explain some of the blur/softness. Something tells me though that even good light and a tripod ain't gonna improve things a whole lot. Can't quite put my finger on it though. Hope I'm wrong.

Which camera is it? And what were your settings? Could be worth checking your ISO
__________________
Too much Saturn, not enough Moon.

Buzzers 2012


Fly Clips & Stands
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2010, 11:11 PM
stuartpengs's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,362
stuartpengs will become famous soon enough
Default

It's an OLYMPUS FE46., ISO was at 1600 which would explain the graining. No flash so the auto ISO increases to compensate for the lack of light which introduces noise in the photo. If you add a little extra light the auto ISO should decrease which will lessen the grain.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by stuartpengs; 11-01-2010 at 11:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2010, 11:19 PM
mancfly's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Manchester
Posts: 704
mancfly is on a distinguished road
Default

flyinghigh, your pics look just fine to me, and a lot better than some on here, OK! However, do pay some attention to the "experts" on here!
__________________
"Angling may be said to be so like mathematics in that it can never be fully understood" - Izaak Walton
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2010, 08:14 AM
weight_forward's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,101
weight_forward is on a distinguished road
Default

There is some really good information here.

I'm no expert but here's my 2p worth, As the above comments really, you need to get down to a faster ISO number to reduce the noise I use ISO100. Drop the exposure compensation down a bit. Both the high ISO number used, and the large amount of exposure compensation (+0.7) indicate that you're struggling for light. I use 2 lamps one above the fly and one to the right both with daylight bulbs and really need a bit more. If you can shoot outside in daylight it's much better. If you can get more light then the picture will be less grainy and the colour saturation better. I don't always use super-macro, sometimes using just macro and a bit of zoom gives a better depth of field and more space to get a bit of light to the fly.

Last tip, I would re-size down a bit, just to make the picture more accesible to people viewing on mobiles etc. I go to 500 pixels wide and 72DPI and the pictures are OK (until you try to zoom in and they get a bit pixelated).

I hope that helps. Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2010, 12:58 PM
Scratch's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chorley
Posts: 8,341
Scratch has a spectacular aura aboutScratch has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by weight_forward View Post
you need to get down to a faster ISO number to reduce the noise I use ISO100.
Slower, Steve!
__________________
Too much Saturn, not enough Moon.

Buzzers 2012


Fly Clips & Stands
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2010, 02:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Somewhere?
Posts: 431
flyinghigh is on a distinguished road
Default

stuart, psychic mate, was an olimpus but x4 2 and the setting was iso 1200 so will turn down to 100 and they were all hand shot.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2010, 02:46 PM
stuartpengs's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,362
stuartpengs will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinghigh View Post
stuart, psychic mate, .
I wish.

It's available on the 'Image info' tab on your photobucket page.
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd