Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > Fly Tying > Fly Tying Forum
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 10:08 AM
Englander's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 1,374
Englander is on a distinguished road
Default Uv ?

Hi Guys

Hope you all had a good Christmas ? Santa was kind to me

One of the goodies i got was a UV pen light, when i shone it on my flies i found two or three of my top patterns used tying materials that "Glowed" like neon signs !!

Coincidence ?? Whats the currnet thinking on wether trout can see in "UV"
__________________
Englander

"Barbless since 2008"

Vision GT Four catapult 9' 6#
Vision GT Four SW 9' 9#
Vision 3 Zone 9' 5#
Vision Cult 9' 3#
Shakespeare Trion 9' 5/6#
Cortland Endurance 9' 6#
Shakespeare Expedition float tube
Vosseler DC3 reel
Okuma Helios 8/9 reel
Greys G series 3/4 reel
Snowbee Geo 3/4 reel
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 10:26 AM
shrek's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fife
Posts: 411
shrek is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to shrek
Default

there are a few theories that trout can see further into the UV spectrum than we do, whether or not they do I can't say, but I do like using UV flies of some sort and seem to have success with them, maybe just a confidence thing, but your find sort of dispells that as you can't be confident of the UV if you didn't know it was in your flies to start with. Until someone asks the trout if they can see UV I guess we'll never know
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 11:00 AM
ickypimp's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 2,964
ickypimp is on a distinguished road
Default

IMO it is nothing more than the emperors new clothes...

UV light has a maximal penetration in PURE water of approximately 7 feet,
Click the image to open in full size.
During that penetration the inversed square law would apply for every doubling of unit length you 1/4 the intensity.. so from the surface to 3.5 feet down you have already lost 75% of the UV intensity...

Secondly we have to consider the fact that the water we fish isn't pure... as well as containing all kinds of dissolve ionic matter which will further increase the spectral absorption.
The water will also contain a significant quantity of particulate matter, this is where a further physical phenomenon known as Raleigh scattering would become a factor...

Rayleigh scattering - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

to cut a long story short the shorter the wavelength (uv is short) the greater the scattering... this would effectively reduce the uv penetration to a neglegable amount...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 11:30 AM
bear's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sunny South Wales
Posts: 310
bear is on a distinguished road
Default

I've got one of those pens.

Loads of flies in my lure box glow, including flies from 10+ years ago.

Now this is the bit I'm not sure about. When people refer to UV flies are they talking about the blue filament ?

The pen highlights what I would refer to as fluorescents, before the UV trend started ?

Last edited by bear; 26-12-2009 at 11:33 AM. Reason: speeling
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 12:29 PM
ickypimp's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 2,964
ickypimp is on a distinguished road
Default

The UV materials people discuss refer to products that are activated by absorbing light in the uv range of the electromagnetic spectrum then use the energy to emit light of a different wavelength somewhere in the visible spectrum

This is where i have issues with the whole concept.... it has been demonstrated many teliosts have the ability to see in the UV , however therse materials are not emitting in the UV they are emitting in the visible... but then it is my reckoning that they will be actually emiting the sum of **** all because of the amount of activating light reaching them...

you are spot on this is fluorescence....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 12:49 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
phaycroft is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ickypimp View Post
The UV materials people discuss refer to products that are activated by absorbing light in the uv range of the electromagnetic spectrum then use the energy to emit light of a different wavelength somewhere in the visible spectrum

This is where i have issues with the whole concept.... it has been demonstrated many teliosts have the ability to see in the UV , however therse materials are not emitting in the UV they are emitting in the visible... but then it is my reckoning that they will be actually emiting the sum of **** all because of the amount of activating light reaching them...

you are spot on this is fluorescence....
I only use a few wet flies with uV straggle friitz included, when I'm fishing in the surface layer, usually in a bit of a wave and mainly for brownies.

However, I seem to have had more success with the same patterns with the uV material than without for both brownies and rainbows. This is based on returns before I used the uV flies on the same waters as I now use flies with uV material in them.

Do you think this is just a coincidence or is there a possibility that the uV material does have a positive effect when used in or near the surface?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 01:16 PM
shrek's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fife
Posts: 411
shrek is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to shrek
Default

Icky, maybe I am wrong here (wouldn't be the first time lol) but surely the figures you gave are based on how we perceive light (whatever type). Is it possible that trout, or any other species, see light in a different way that us making these figures irrelevant??
And can you not charge UV material before you fish it to give off UV without sunlight?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 02:22 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,279
arkle will become famous soon enough
Default

I've yet to get a copy, but there's a new book that's recently been published on the subject of U.V. & fishes perception of it. "The New Scientific Angling - Trout & Ultra Violet Vision" by Reed F. Curry.

There's a thread where further details of it in Fly Tying in the Classic Streamer & Wet Fly section. The thread makes interesting reading.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 03:15 PM
Macmagoo's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,371
Macmagoo is on a distinguished road
Default

I have read something about this and the article made the point that only younger fish can see the UV light.
__________________
A Bad Days Fishing Is Better Than A Good Day At Work
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2009, 03:30 PM
Gander's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fife
Posts: 3,709
Gander is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macmagoo View Post
I have read something about this and the article made the point that only younger fish can see the UV light.
I was just thinking the same thing.
__________________

But Jesus beheld them and said unto them, "With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."

Matthew 19:26
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd