We had a clarion call at the weekend from Wingman for more fly photos, so...
It occurs to me that we all have in our boxes flies that take little effort to tie but catch loads of fish, and we all have flies that took a massive effort to tie and have never caught a fish (possibly for anyone

).
So, let's see your best and your worst. You don't even need to tie any flies. Dig out your boxes, and have a hunt for that fly that is a waste of (far too much) material.
At the same time, have a think about which of your flies that out of all your bread and butter patterns is the one that you can tie up a dozen in 10 minutes and will each guarantee to put fish on the bank for you.
To kick off, here's my own contribution.
I'm not knocking the pattern, I guess there are people who catch fish with it, or else it wouldn't get a write up in magazines... but...
Back in 2000, when we were heading over to Ireland, we were given a list of about 100 essential

patterns to tie up. Two of these were the 'Raymond' and the 'Raymond Variant'. Variant? They don't even look alike! I had a go at doing them, but what a faff. I could barely get the whole thing on a size 10. Who decided all those ingredients were necessary to make it catch a fish, FFS?
I can't remember which is the Raymond and which is the variant. It must have taken me an hour each at least by the time I dug out everything required. I can't remember if either of them even got wet. They certainly never caught a fish and have spent the last 10 years languishing in the darkest recesses of my fly box, only occasionally catching my eye to remind me of those 2 hours of my life I will never get back.
Meanwhile, I present, the Shipman's buzzer. If ever there was a fly that was absolute simplicity to tie, simplicity to fish, and every season accounts for huge numbers of fish, this is it.
So, let's see your flies that rate tops in terms of bangs for bucks, and those you consider to be a waste of time, effort and materials.
Col