Fly Fishing Forums
Go Back   Fly Fishing Forums > Fishing Photography > A Fisherman's Guide to Fishing Photography
Forums Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 12:08 PM
Endrick's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Stirlingshire
Posts: 1,081
Endrick is on a distinguished road
Default Photography - technical question

I suppose I should join a photography forum but I know there are some very knowledgeable people on here.

I've got 3 Nikon camera bodies. Two DX format - D40 and D90 and one FX format - D700.

When I take photographs in average to good light the photographs are virtually indistinguishable in quality - no matter whether I am using a cheap and cheerful lens or a high quality one.

However in poor light things change a lot. The D700 is excellent and I understand why. What I don't understand is why the D40 is quite close to it. The D90 trails behind.

The only thing I can think is that the D40 has only 6MP compared to the D90 with 12MP. Therefore it seems to me that the same glass is not dividing up the light per pixel to the same extent. Does this make sense? If this is the case then is there a general penalty to pay for more MPs in DSLRs - especially when we don't change the sensor size?

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 12:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,276
arkle will become famous soon enough
Default

I only own 1 dslr body, a D50 but it could be that the higher pixel count see's more of the lower end of the light spectrum. Are you manually setting the white balance on each camera ?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 03:47 PM
Darren Lewis's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 2,622
Darren Lewis is on a distinguished road
Default

It could be caused by noise during processing, the higher the pixel count the lower the light reaching each pixel, so the reading from each pixel has to be amplified more, which also amplifies the noise. Higher MP doesn't necessarily mean better pictures, especially in the cheap cameras where the processor just isn't up to it making it slow to use as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 04:08 PM
Scratch's Avatar
Trade Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chorley
Posts: 8,337
Scratch has a spectacular aura aboutScratch has a spectacular aura about
Default

This is exactly the sort of thing the Cap'n ponders as he drifts off to sleep Me? I count hot little vixens wearing rubber jumpsuits jumping over my garden wall and chasing me into my bedroom, sorry, I mean I'm inclined to go with Darren's theory of less light per pixel.
__________________
Too much Saturn, not enough Moon.

Buzzers 2012


Fly Clips & Stands
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 05:01 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: EAST COAST OF IRELAND
Posts: 4,953
hobble is on a distinguished road
Default

Aye true rob, now we must enter into the size of each pixel??? Its getting complicated...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 05:02 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: durham
Posts: 1,121
abacus180 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Endrick View Post
I suppose I should join a photography forum but I know there are some very knowledgeable people on here.

I've got 3 Nikon camera bodies. Two DX format - D40 and D90 and one FX format - D700.

When I take photographs in average to good light the photographs are virtually indistinguishable in quality - no matter whether I am using a cheap and cheerful lens or a high quality one.

However in poor light things change a lot. The D700 is excellent and I understand why. What I don't understand is why the D40 is quite close to it. The D90 trails behind.

The only thing I can think is that the D40 has only 6MP compared to the D90 with 12MP. Therefore it seems to me that the same glass is not dividing up the light per pixel to the same extent. Does this make sense? If this is the case then is there a general penalty to pay for more MPs in DSLRs - especially when we don't change the sensor size?

Malcolm
As in everything there has to be a trade off. Its all about collecting the available photons of light. Larger pixels collect more light than smaller ones but the resolution suffers.
The term you are looking for is the Modulation Transfer Function and each will have its own graph of values.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2011, 10:18 AM
ickypimp's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 2,964
ickypimp is on a distinguished road
Default

are the physical dimensions of the cmos chips the same in each body..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2011, 07:39 PM
wingman's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 2,509
wingman is on a distinguished road
Default

Oh lord give me back my polaroid instamatic camera
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2011, 07:42 PM
Endrick's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Stirlingshire
Posts: 1,081
Endrick is on a distinguished road
Default

Icky Pimp.

I know the sensor sizes in the D40(6MP) and D90(12MP) are the same 370mm2

- many times the size of a compact. The D700 (864mm2)is much larger again.

P.S. does anyone know how to put in superscript in this PHP editor - I wanted to put in the "squared" symbol above?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2011, 08:01 PM
stuartpengs's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,362
stuartpengs will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Endrick View Post

P.S. does anyone know how to put in superscript in this PHP editor - I wanted to put in the "squared" symbol above?
Easiest way is to just use C&P from the Windows Character Map Endrick. To access it go to 'Start' > 'All Programs' > 'System Tools' > 'Character Map' and just select the one you want.

Like so ²
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
too technical? horses50 General Fly Fishing Discussion 38 08-03-2011 01:16 PM
Need Help.Technical Support PLEASE! thedeadskunk General Fly Fishing Discussion 8 23-12-2008 09:22 AM






All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Loading...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006-2011 Fish&Fly Ltd