Hi Campbell, link is
http://www.ceff.org.uk/PDF%20Files%2...tution2007.pdf although it is quite far down the pages.
Pretty much the same principles as Scotland, no semi stage but they do not have the waters for larger heats/final and prefer 2 less severe cuts.
Don't know how CEFF do their rounding up, whatever is done it can produce what seems a strange result. Fairest and most consistent way is to stick with same basis, best %age performance qualifies (other opinions may differ).
3 heats, entrants on the day (a) 88, (b) 70 and (c) 46 with target of 25% with 0.5 rounded up. Initial qualifiers would be (a) 22 (b) 18 and (c) 12. If due to call offs after the initial %age was decided or whatever, another 3 were required the best non qualifiers from (a) would be 23/88 (26.14%) and 24/88(27.3%), (b) 19/70 (27.1%), (c) 13/46 (28.3%). 2 would come from a, 1from b and none from c.
If however the following year, same again except 48 in (c), result would still be 12 at first 13/48 is however 27.1% so it would be one from each which at a glance looks inconsistent.
Add a small heat say 26 resulting in 7 with 8/26 (31%), they will not even be in the equation.