No worries mate I agree with what your saying.
Well done to the qualifiers of the match.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredaevans
Named he was (which I though unusual), but like yourself I wonder why. What ever it was it had to be a major "No-No." For context, save for what I've read here, I don't know diddly about comp fishing.
But wasn't this the second time in just a few short weeks where the winner changed for violating Comp Rules? Or this just an expansion of the first (thread)?
Fred
|
---------- Post added at 01:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 PM ----------
Very unfortunate for this to happen, but I wouldn't let the minority spoil it for the majority. Keep up the good work and well done on picking up on it. I think the video cameras are a great idea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toft_Newton_Fishery
and that is not what I have set out to do. I quite simply feel that those that have fished by the rules and placed, be correctly recognised and paid out.
It is quite obvious that Chantrell was involved as well as 2 other parties and if those individuals wish to explain then that's up to them.
Basically the comp was fished to a six fish limit including catch & release on the way to the bag, when 6 were killed fishing then stops. On studying video from the day it was apparent that Chantrell had miscounted.
I would like to point out that all prize monies have been returned to me and will be correctly distributed.
There's been enough controversy around the whole winnerweb event and this for me pretty much puts the tin lid on it!
I run a good honest fishery at Toft and treat my customers with respect, is it too much to ask for them to return the same?
Perhaps charity matches are the way forward to raise money for those that need the cash so bad?
JF
|